Complexity Is a Waste of Time (and therefore money)

3/5/2014

The new ICD-10 is out–and over a 1000 pages long. This is the book we doctors are forced to follow when billing for our services. It is a list of diagnoses and conditions we must adhere to when trying to justify our importance to patients and more critically to their insurers so that we can be paid. It weighs in at several pounds but its value is inversely proportional to its size: it does nothing to improve patient care, and less than nothing to keep down costs–in fact because it takes an inordinate amount of time to use this garbage doctors have less time to actually take care of patients and are incentivized to extract as much reimbursement from better coding from this time-consuming process as they can–which inevitably leads to higher medical costs. Duh.

Just one more example of how unecessarily complex our health care system is–could we please just take care of patients?

Let me give you an example. When I admit a patient to the hospital with pneumonia I am not allowed to simply write a diagnosis of pneumonia, the liklihood of how and where it was acquired denoting an assessment of the risk and severity of it, and also of the indicated treatment. To be paid the best level (which matters very much to my employer if not to me) I have to write what kind of pneumonia it is, for instance, due to gram positive or gram negative bacteria. I have to write this even though I don’t know, and will never know, what kind of bacteria it is. This is because we don’t sample lungs for bacteria – it’s dangerous- too dangerous to risk. So we guess. No matter what hoity-toity medical center you go to – we always guess at the cause of pneumonia. In fact the pneumonia may not be bacterial at all – it may be viral- and which is even less easy to identify than bacterial. But still we are forced to adhere to this guessing game of what specific kind it is to be paid. Stupid, just stupid because it doesn’t serve the patient, it doesn’t serve the doctor. It just serves the insurance company. Bravo American health care.

New Cholesterol Guidelines

March 7, 2014 

Latest guidelines advise more people should be using statins and at younger ages. Not so fast. Internationally, doctors are debating this intensely. Count me on the side of the skeptics because there is much to be suspicious of here.

Too many current recommendations are based on flawed data produced in studies commissioned by and for makers of drugs. Research is inherently unsound when it is designed to produce certain results, no matter which prominent names in the field of science are attached: if researchers are taking money from the drug companies, they are by definition biased. Most of the doctors who’ve come together in this paper to advise younger people and those with minimal elevations of cholesterol to take statins directly benefit financially from the giant pharmaceutical companies that make the drugs they are recommending.

What we do know is that statins as a class of drugs (lipitor, mevacor, zocor etc.) are effective in bringing down total cholesterol and LDL’s (one of the bad kinds of fat in the blood). We are also pretty sure that statins can reduce the amount of plaque already formed in some blood vessels and that these actions may stave off disease and death for some people at high risk of vascular disease (heart attack, stroke, etc). But the latest study does not tell us that low risk patients would benefit from using these drugs or at what levels or age they should start. There are potential harms to using any drug, and when your risk of disease is low then the risk of taking the drug is more likely to outweigh the benefit. As many as 23 people would have to take a statin for 10 years to prevent a heart attack in one person. That’s a lot of pills, a lot of side effects and a lot of money for 22 out of those 23 people. As previous blunders have proven before (think vioxx and heart attack as a recent example) drugs are often rushed to market before benefits and safety in widespread use are proven.

My advice: take a statin if your doctor recommends it based on your atherosclerotic disease risk – that is, your lipid profile combined with your personal and family history–but don’t go on it just to make your numbers lower. Regardless of whether you would benefit from a statin, keep doing all those other things you are capable of to keep your cholesterol in line. Every personal intervention you can make (weight management, exercise, stopping smoking) is better than any drug. In other words, an ounce of prevention…you know the rest.

Advice to New Doctors

3/28/2015

There is no doubt that the business of medicine has changed in the thirty years I’ve been in practice, just as it did in the thirty years before that, and the thirty years before that. What hasn’t changed is the ability, and the privilege, of a physician to deliver excellent care to his or her patients, with compassion, dignity and respect. In fact, over time these qualities have become even more important to my patients, for whom such care stands out more than ever.

National health care does not frighten me; I believe dumping the insurers is the only way to place the patient and the primary care physician back at the center of health care. The insurance industry, after all, is not in business to serve the patient (nor us), but the stockholder. Every dollar in the shareholder’s pocket is another dollar taken at the expense of the patient’s health. I have spent plenty of time arguing with private insurers on the phone to get my patients what they need, something I have never had to do with Medicare. Further, the data are clear on two points about Medicare: it is the most cost-effective and quality-driven insurer out there; it could be even more so but for lobbyists and the politicians beholden to them )which is almost all of them).

“Cookbook medicine” has been the bogey man since I was in training, so I am rather inclined to roll my eyes at the same paranoia spouted today. There is too much to know for any of us docs, I don’t care how dedicated you are, to keep up with everything every day. Particularly in family or internal medicine. While I certainly do practice medicine on individuals, I take very seriously the data that helps us identify what works and what doesn’t, what’s harmful and what is not. Algorithms and reminders help to make our care idiot-proof, and allows us to spend more time with our patients.

Lastly, I work with a lot of new graduates in my current field of hospital medicine (I had my own private practice for > 20 years), and find them to be just as dedicated to patients as anyone I knew at OSU 30 yrs ago. About the only difference in the past 15 years is the zeal with which most of the new grads, out- and in-patient oriented, get consults. This is the place where I think we need to get back on track with education: our patients do not need more specialists—they need fewer. They don’t need more testing, by and large they need less, and better directed evaluation and treatment.

My advice to new docs is to go out there and be the best doc you can be with each patient every day. Find joy in your work—if you do that, no change in health care policy can take it away. Know when to play by the rules and when it’s worth trying to break them. Stand up for what you believe in, not just on media sites, but in conversations—let people know what you know. Learn the data on health care policy and become an advocate for all your patients, not just those who can pay you (you may want to check out PNHP.org if you’re looking for data). Good luck, and may the force be with you…!

Healthy Hearts and Mediterranean Diet

2/27/2013 

So, a study has just been terminated early because the results were so obvious so soon. This does not happen often in research so we pay attention when it does. What was the news? The Mediterranean diet – quite high in olive oil, fresh fruits, veggies, fish and nuts—is so good for you that all of us, even people who already have heart disease, are demonstrably more healthy (fewer heart attacks, living longer) from the time they start the diet. The differences between those on the Mediterranean plan and not on it were “spectacular” in the words of one researcher.

How much olive oil? Four, yes 4, tablespoons daily on average. That’s a lot! Two quarts per month! I’m not suggesting you swallow it like medicine—just switch to using it in your everyday cooking. for some time I have been using it in nearly everything I do that needs oil – salads, sautéing meats and vegetables, the rare frying that I do (olive oil changes flavor if you get it too hot too long). I use it everywhere except in baking sweets.

Of course the rest is kind of not news—we’ve been told for a while about the benefits of fresh fruits & veggies. I’m a bit more flummoxed by the fish thing because I find myself weighing so many other factors every time I’m at the store– like how many neurotoxins (mercury, lead, cadmium etc) is in the species of fish I’m buying? Is the fish on an endangered list? Is the factory farm it’s produced at polluting the neighboring stream? And in the middle of land-locked Ohio –is it fresh? (Because I don’t care how good it is for me if it tastes like cat-food!) I buy fish of course, but I’m always in a quandary…

Bon appétit!